- 收听数
- 0
- 性别
- 保密
- 听众数
- 3
- 最后登录
- 2018-7-17
- QQ
- UID
- 29863
- 阅读权限
- 10
- 帖子
- 34
- 精华
- 0
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 注册时间
- 2018-7-17
- 科研币
- 0
- 速递币
- 33
- 娱乐币
- 76
- 文献值
- 0
- 资源值
- 0
- 贡献值
- 0
|
here are varying points of view when it comes to theoretically conceptualizing curiosity and exploration. Research findings seem to be dependent on the theoretical orientation of the theorist and the emphasis lies on internal or external stimulus conditions, primary-inborn or secondary-acquired drives, and homeostatic-biogenetic versus nonhomeostatic-psychological motivations.
This is a difficult topic to conceptualize because of the circular nature of the terms and the contradiction and inconclusiveness of the research. Curiosity, exploration, motivation and drive are defined, described, explained and operationally defined in terms of one another, and thus become embedded and intertwined. |
|