- 收听数
- 1
- 性别
- 保密
- 听众数
- 23
- 最后登录
- 2021-8-15
- QQ
- UID
- 1559
- 阅读权限
- 40
- 帖子
- 1983
- 精华
- 0
- 在线时间
- 1535 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-11-22
- 科研币
- 89
- 速递币
- 1530
- 娱乐币
- 4077
- 文献值
- 340
- 资源值
- 0
- 贡献值
- 1
|
速递书局
封面: |
- |
题名: |
The Idea of Private Law |
作者: |
Ernest J Weinrib (Author) |
出版社: |
Oxford University Press |
出版日期: |
December 5, 2012 |
ISBN: |
978-0199664795 |
附属页: |
齐全 |
书签: |
有 |
格式: |
图版PDF |
内容简介: |
- |
求助帖链接: |
- |
Nearly twenty years after its original publication, The Idea of Private Law is widely recognized as a seminal contribution to legal philosophy, and one of the leading attempts to explain and justify the moral foundations of private law. Rejecting the functionalism popular among legal scholars, Ernest Weinrib advances the provocative idea that private law is an autonomous and non-instrumental moral practice, with its own structure and rationality. Weinrib draws on Kant and Aristotle to set out an approach to private law that repudiates the identification of law with politics or economics. Weinrib argues that private law is to be understood not as a mechanism for promoting efficiency but as a juridical enterprise in which coherent public reason elaborates the norms implicit in the parties' interaction.
Private law, Weinrib tells us, embodies a special morality that links the doer and the sufferer of harm. Weinrib elucidates the standpoint internal to this morality, in opposition to functionalists, who view private law as an instrument in the service of external and independently justifiable goals. After establishing the inadequacy of functionalist approaches, Weinrib traces the implications of the formalism he proposes for our ideas of the structure, coherence, and normative grounding of private law. Furthermore, the author shows how this formalism manifests itself in the leading doctrines of private law liability. Finally, he describes the public but non-political role of the courts in articulating the special morality of private law.
|
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?快速注册
-
总评分: 速递币 + 50
文献值 + 2
查看全部评分
|