- 收听数
- 0
- 性别
- 保密
- 听众数
- 1
- 最后登录
- 2024-9-2
- QQ
 - UID
- 13772
- 阅读权限
- 100
- 帖子
- 4533
- 精华
- 0
- 在线时间
- 2018 小时
- 注册时间
- 2015-4-21
  
- 科研币
- 145
- 速递币
- 28
- 娱乐币
- 1670
- 文献值
- 249
- 资源值
- 131
- 贡献值
- 0
|
速递书局
| 封面: |
 |
| 题名: |
Democracy and Ontology : Agonism Between Political Liberalism, Foucault and Psychoanalysis |
| 作者: |
Rosenthal, Irena |
| 出版社: |
Hart Publishing |
| 出版日期: |
2018-01-01 |
| ISBN: |
9781509912230 |
| 附属页: |
齐全 |
| 书签: |
有 |
| 格式: |
清晰PDF |
| 内容简介: |
This book investigates the relationship between liberal democracies and ontology, that is, philosophical claims about the constitution of agents and the social world. Many philosophers argue that ontology needs to be avoided in political and legal philosophy. In fact, political liberalism, a highly influential paradigm founded by the philosopher John Rawls, makes the avoidance of ontology a core ambition of its 'political, non-metaphysical' programme. In contrast to political liberalism, this book argues that attending to ontological disputes is essential to political and legal philosophy. Illuminating, criticising and developing ontological arguments does not only enhance our understanding of justice, but also highlights key features of democratic citizenship. The argument is built up by bringing together three traditions of thought that have so far not been confronted with one another: political liberalism, the work of Michel Foucault, and the psychoanalytic theories of Sigmund Freud and Donald Winnicott. The book also investigates more concrete implications of ontological disputes by drawing on several case studies: a Dutch political-legal debate about greeting rituals; an American conflict about the legalisation of religious freedom; and the struggles for resilience of two American social movement groups. |
| 求助帖链接: |
http://www.expaper.cn/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=140230 |
本帖子中包含更多资源
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看，没有帐号？快速注册
|
发表于 2018-4-26 18:38:29
淘帖
收藏
顶
踩
