开启辅助访问 购买速递币 快速注册 找回密码 切换风格

科研速递论坛

83

主题

0

好友

3

积分

渐入佳境

Rank: 3Rank: 3

科研币
0
速递币
2704
娱乐币
4533
文献值
339
资源值
0
贡献值
0
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2017-4-9 22:47:35 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
5速递币
题名Results of Neoteam: A randomized multicenter phase II study of liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride + trastuzumab vs conventional doxorubicin both in combination with cyclophosphamide and followed by docetaxel + trastuzumab as neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive primary breast cancer
作者S. Pernas Simon1, M. Rezai2, M. Hauschild3, J.P. Machiels4, S. Paepke5, A. Llombart Cussac6
杂志Annals of Oncology
年|卷|期(2016) 27 (6):
页码68-99. 10.1093/annonc/mdw365
链接http://oncologypro.esmo.org/Meeting-Resources/ESMO-2016/Results-of-Neoteam-A-randomized-multicenter-phase-II-study-of-liposomal-doxorubicin-hydrochloride-trastuzumab-vs-conventional-doxorubicin-both-in-combination-with-cyclophosphamide-and-followed-by-docetaxel-trastuzumab-as-neoadjuvant-treatment-of-HER2

本帖最后由 pendave 于 2017-4-10 10:05 编辑

Results of Neoteam: A randomized multicenter phase II study of liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride + trastuzumab vs conventional doxorubicin both in combination with cyclophosphamide and followed by docetaxel + trastuzumab as neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive primary breast cancer

143

主题

23

好友

61

积分

自成一派

Rank: 5Rank: 5

科研币
68
速递币
57
娱乐币
10
文献值
5942
资源值
0
贡献值
0

应助达人

沙发
发表于 2017-4-9 23:14:28 |只看该作者
OK              

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?快速注册

回复

举报 该帖为应助帖

83

主题

0

好友

3

积分

渐入佳境

Rank: 3Rank: 3

科研币
0
速递币
2704
娱乐币
4533
文献值
339
资源值
0
贡献值
0
板凳
发表于 2017-4-9 23:35:08 |只看该作者
gyrowheel 发表于 2017-4-9 23:14
OK

啊 这个pdf里的文字跟 页面http://oncologypro.esmo.org/Meet ... t-treatment-of-HER2 内的一样啊,只是摘要?

83

主题

0

好友

3

积分

渐入佳境

Rank: 3Rank: 3

科研币
0
速递币
2704
娱乐币
4533
文献值
339
资源值
0
贡献值
0
地板
发表于 2017-4-9 23:36:11 |只看该作者
293P - Results of Neoteam: A randomized multicenter phase II study of liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride + trastuzumab vs conventional doxorubicin both i...

Date        10 October 2016
Event        ESMO 2016 Congress
Session        Poster display
Topics        Breast Cancer, Metastatic
Presenter        Sonia Pernas Simon
Citation        Annals of Oncology (2016) 27 (6): 68-99. 10.1093/annonc/mdw365
Authors        S. Pernas Simon1, M. Rezai2, M. Hauschild3, J.P. Machiels4, S. Paepke5, A. Llombart Cussac6
Author Affiliations
Abstract

Background

The addition of trastuzumab (TH) to primary chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) significantly improved pathological complete response (pCR) and survival. Concurrent use of TH to an anthracycline taxane-based regimen increased pCR but raised concerns about cardiac toxicity. Given the lower cardiotoxicity of liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride (MYOCET®), the objective of this study was to explore the benefit of liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride plus TH in a neoadjuvant scenario.

Methods

Patients with stage II-III HER2-positive BC were randomized to liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride (60 mg/m2) plus cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) and TH (MCH) or conventional doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide alone (AC), each followed by docetaxel (100 mg/m2) and TH. The primary objective of this trial, carried out in 21 European centers, was efficacy assessed by BC-pCR; secondary objectives included pCR by hormonal status and disease stage, progression-free survival (PFS) at 5 years, and safety.

Results

From Mar 2008-Oct 2010, 126 patients were enrolled and were evaluable. No statistically significant differences were observed in demographics and baseline clinical characteristics between treatment groups. Adverse events and discontinuations during cycles 1-8 were similar in both treatment groups. pCR was 41.3% for the MCH group and 54.0% for the AC but differences were not statistically significant (p =.154, 95% CI −0.30 to 0.05). However, in patients with stage II disease, pCR was 31.0% vs 62.5% in favor of AC (p =.004; 95% CI 0.52-0.11). PFS was similar in both arms. The safety profile was similar in both groups; however, more patients in the AC group (12.7%) experienced cardiovascular events than in the MCH group (6.5%).

Conclusions

MCH was similar in efficacy to the traditional regimen of AC in terms of pCR in HER2-positive BC. However in stage II patients alone, the AC arm had a significant benefit in terms of pCR. More patients in the AC group experienced cardiovascular events than in the MCH group.

Clinical trial identification

C19562/2037/BC/EU

Legal entity responsible for the study

This is a company-sponsored study: Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. Sponsor's Responsible Medical Officer Richard Malamut, MD

Funding

Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.

Disclosure

S. Paepke: Honoraria from Teva. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

143

主题

23

好友

61

积分

自成一派

Rank: 5Rank: 5

科研币
68
速递币
57
娱乐币
10
文献值
5942
资源值
0
贡献值
0

应助达人

5#
发表于 2017-4-9 23:41:45 |只看该作者
您当前未认领,请先认领应助防止无法获得奖励。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 快速注册

发布主题 !fastreply! 返回列表 官方QQ群

QQ|Translate Forum into English|QQ群:821993|Archiver|手机版|申请友链| 科研速递论坛

GMT+8, 2024-11-16 13:19 , Processed in 0.065618 second(s), 32 queries .

© 2012-2099 www.expaper.cn

!fastreply! 回顶部 !return_list!